Association of Arab Universities

المجلد 46, 2026 · العدد 3 · الوصول المفتوح · مزدوجة التعمية مراجعة الأقران

مقالة بحثية أصلية

المحددات الاجتماعية والاقتصادية والأكاديمية للمهارات الرقمية

1 جامعة عبدالمالك السعدي

* المؤلف المراسل: نورالدين الورغي ([email protected])

تاريخ النشر: ١٥ سبتمبر ٢٠٢٦

https://doi.org/10.36024/1248-046-03-001
المستخلص

هدف المقال الكشف عن العوامل والأبعاد الاجتماعية والاقتصادية والأكاديمية المؤثرة على مستوى المهارات الرقمية لدى طلبة جامعة عبد المالك السعدي، واستقصاء مدى تأثير هذه الأبعاد على مستوى استخدام التقنيات الرقمية في إطار التفاوتات من المستوى الثاني، أي فروق في مهارات الإستخدام. اعتمدت الدراسة على مراجعة للأدبيات من خلال استعراض دراسات سابقة، مع تحليل بيانات ميدانية تشمل المتوسطات الحسابية والتكرارات، بالإضافة إلى تحليل التباين بين الفئات وتفسير التفاوتات بناءً على العوامل التي تؤثر على مستوى المهارات الرقمية بين الطلاب. أظهرت النتائج أن التفاوتات الاجتماعية والاقتصادية تؤثر بشكل واضح على مستوى المهارات الرقمية المتعلقة بالقدرة على الاستخدام، البحث عن المعلومة، تحقيق الحضور الاجتماعي، إنشاء المحتوى. تؤكد الدراسة أن الوصول إلى التكنولوجيا واستخدامها بكفاءة يتوقف على عوامل اجتماعية واقتصادية ومعرفية مترابطة، ويجب أن تتظافر الجهود لتطوير السياسات التعليمية والاجتماعية لمواجهة هذه التحديات.

الكلمات المفتاحيةالمحددات الاجتماعيةالمحددات الاقتصاديةالمحددات الأكاديميةالمهارات الرقميةالرأسمال الرقمي

المواضيع الرئيسية

e-Learning, Educational PsychologyHuman Resources ManagementHumanitiesSocial Sciences

رخصة المشاع الإبداعي

Journal License

هذا العمل مرخص بموجب رخصة Attribution 4.0 International

المراجع

  1. Alexander J. A. M. van Deursen, A. v. (2000). Development and validation of the Internet of of Things Skills Scale (IoTSS). Information, Communication & Society VOL. 25, 1883–1899. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1900320
  2. Al-Sumait, F. Helsper, E, J. Rahali, M. (2023). Adapting global methodologies to digital inequalities research in a multicultural Arab environment. Convergence, 01-23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565231174594
  3. Attewell, P. (2001). The first and second digital divides. Sociology of Education, 252–259. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2673277
  4. Berry, D. (2015). Critical theory and the digital. New York : Bloomsbury.
  5. Bonfadelli, H. (2002). The Internet and Knowledge Gaps: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation. European Journal of Communication, 17(1), 65-84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323102017001607
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. In J. Richardson, Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241–58). Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.
  7. Calderon G, D. (2019). Technological capital and digital ´ divide among young people: An intersectional approach. 22,. Journal of Youth Studies, 941–958. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2018.1559283
  8. Castaño-Muñoz, J. (2009). Digital Inequality Among University Students in Developed Countries and its Relation to Academic Performance. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal vol. 7 n.º 1, 43-52. Retrieved from https://rusc.uoc.edu/rusc/ca/index.php/rusc/index.html
  9. De Boer, P. S. (2023). The IoT, easy as anything? Uncovering the importance of digital skills for the Internet of Things. Twente: University of Twente. doi:https://doi.org/10.3990/1.9789036555951
  10. Dijk, J. A. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. London: Sage.
  11. DIJK, J. V. (2020). The Digital Divide. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  12. DiMaggio, P. Hargittai, E. (2002). From the “Digital divide” to “Digital inequality”: Studying Internet use as penetration increases. Princeton, NJ: University Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies, 01-23.
  13. Drabowicz, T. (2017). Social theory of internet use: Corroboration or rejection among the digital natives? Correspondence analysis of adolescents in two societies. Computers & Education, 105, 57–67. doi:doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.004
  14. E Hargittai. (2021). Handbook of digital inequality. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  15. EGEV, E. (2010). Google and the Digital Divide, The bias of online knowledge. Oxford •Cambridge •New Delhi: Elsevier.
  16. Ferreira, D. V.-A. (2021, April 30). The three levels of the urban digital divide: Bridging issues of coverage, usage and its outcomes VGI platforms. Geoforum 124, pp. 195-206. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.05.002
  17. Gómez, D. C. (2020). The third digital divide and Bourdieu: Bidirectional conversion of economic, cultural, and social capital to (and from) digital capital among young people in Madrid. new media & society, 1–20. doi:https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/journals-permissions
  18. Hargittai, E. (2002). Second level digital divide Differences in People’s Online Skills. arXiv preprint, 1-20. doi:https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v7i4.942
  19. Hargittai, E. (2022). Connected in Isolation Digital Privilege in Unsettled Times. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
  20. Helsper & Van Deursen. (2015). THE THIRD-LEVEL DIGITAL DIVIDE: WHO BENEFITS MOST FROM BEING ONLINE? In Communication and Information Technologies Annual, 29-52. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020150000010002
  21. Helsper & Van Deursen. (2020). The youth Digital Skills Indicator: Report on the conceptualisation and development of the ySKILLS digital skills measure. KU Leuven, Leuven: Yskills.
  22. Helsper, E. (2021). digital disconnect: The social causes and consequences of digital inequalities. The Digital Disconnect. Melbourne: SAGE.
  23. Helsper, E. J. (2012). A Corresponding Fields Model for the Links Between Social and Digital Exclusion. Communication Theory 22, 403–426. doi:doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01416.x
  24. Helsper, E. J. (2016). The Social Relativity of Digital Exclusion: Applying Relative Deprivation Theory to Digital Inequalities. Media and Communications, 223-242. doi:doi:10.1111/comt.12110
  25. Helsper, E.J., van Deursen, A.J.A.M. & Eynon, R. (2015). Tangible Outcomes of Internet Use. From Digital Skills to Tangible Outcomes project report. University of Twente. Retrieved from https://research.utwente.nl/en/publications/measuring-digital-skills-from-digital-skills-to-tangible-outcomes
  26. Ignatow, G. Robinson, R. (2017). Pierre Bourdieu: theorizing the digital. Information. Communication & Society, 950-966. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1301519
  27. Kvasny, L. (2005). The role of the habitus in shaping discourses about the digital divide. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 10(2). doi: doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00242.x
  28. Lupton, D. M. (2018). THE DIGITAL ACADEMIC Critical Perspectives on Digital Technologies in Higher Education. New York: Routledge.
  29. Park, S. (2017). Digital Capital. Bruce, ACT, Australia: Springer Nature.
  30. Puckett, C. (2022). Digital Adaptability: A New Measure for Digital Inequality Research. Social Science Computer Review, 40(3), 641-662. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439320926087
  31. Rafalow, M. H. (2020). How Schools Create Inequality in the Tech Era. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi:DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226726724.001.0001
  32. Ragnedda, M. (2017). The third digital divide: A Weberian approach to digital inequalities. New York: Routledge.
  33. Ragnedda, M. R. (2020). Digital capital: A Bourdieusian perspective on the digital divide. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
  34. Robinson, J. P. (2003). New social survey perspectives on the digital divide. It & Society 1.5, 1-22. doi:https://search.gesis.org/publication/csa-sa-200506350
  35. Robinson, L. W. (2018). Interlocking inequalities: Digital stratification meets academic stratification. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(9), 1251-1272. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218773826
  36. Scheerder, A. (2019). INEVITABLE INEQUALITIES? Exploring Differences in Internet Domestication Between Less and Highly Educated Families [PhD Thesis - Research UT, graduation UT, University of Twente]. University of Twente. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3990/1.9789036548571
  37. Scheerder, A. V. (2017). Determinants of Internet skills, uses and outcomes. A systematic review of the second-and third-level digital divide. Telematics and informatics, 1607-1624. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585317303192
  38. Sicilia, M. A.-B.-A. (2018). Digital skills training in Higher Education: insights about the perceptions of different stakeholders. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 781-787). Salamanca: ACM Digital Librart. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/3284179.3284312
  39. Smahel, D. M. (2023). Theoretical Integration of ySKILLS: Towards a New Model of Digital Literacy. KU Leuven: ySKILLS. doi:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10090716
  40. Stefano De Marco, G. D.‐G.‐M.‐L.‐C. (2023). Jobless and Burnt Out: Digital Inequality and Online Access to the Labor Market. Social inclusion, 11(4), 184-197. doi:https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v11i4.7017
  41. Van Deursen, A. J. (2017). The Compoundness and Sequentiality of Digital Inequality. International Journal of Communication 11, 452–473. Retrieved from https://www.utwente.nl/en/bms/vandijk/publications/compoundness.pdf
  42. Van Dijk, J., van Deursen, A. (2010). Inequalities of digital skills and how to overcome them. In Y. K.-G. Enrico Ferro, Handbook of Research on Overcoming Digital Divides: Constructing an Equitable and Competitive Information Society (pp. 278-291). Hershey • New York: IGI Global.
  43. Van, D. A. (2014). Measuring digital skills: from digital skills to tangible outcomes project report. Twente: University of Twente. Retrieved from https://ictlogy.net/bibliography/reports/projects.php?idp=2725
  44. Van, Deursen, A. J, Van, Dijk. (2014). Digital skills: Unlocking the information society. New York: Springer.
  45. Witte, J. C & Mannon. (2010). The internet and social inequalities. New York: Routledge.
  46. Wright, A. (2025). Artificial Intelligence For Students. Independently published.
  47. Zhang, M. (2015). Internet use that reproduces educational inequalities: Evidence from big data. Computers & Education, 86,, 212-223.